Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 69: 104441, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244653

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and radiological effectiveness of ocrelizumab in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in a clinical practice setting and describe its tolerability and adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted comparing clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of all patients with (pw)PPMS and RRMS who had received treatment with ocrelizumab at least one cycle and have been followed up for one year at minimum. RESULTS: 42 patients (27 women) treated with ocrelizumab: 29 had RRMS and 13 PPMS. The follow-up period was 26.4 ± 8.4 months. The proportion of pwRRMS with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in the first year was 69.2% and in the second was 80%. In the first year, radiological activity was reduced by 80.0% in pwRRMS and 91.7% in pwPPMS. In the second year, radiological activity was completely reduced in both groups. A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was observed between the pre-ocrelizumab rate of disability progression vs. the first year rate of progression for pwRRMS and pwPPMS. However, an increase in the disability progression rate in the second year of treatment was found in pwPPMS. Ocrelizumab was mostly well tolerated and some adverse effects were reported: infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were the most frequent adverse event, followed by infections and hematological side effects. Discontinuations were due to infections, hematological complications, and perception of ineffectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Ocrelizumab was very effective in reducing relapses and MRI activity. The rate of progression was slowed down; however, the effect was more evident for pwRRMS than for pwPPMS over time.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Female , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/chemically induced , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy , Recurrence
2.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol ; 8(8): 1755-1759, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1347387

ABSTRACT

The objective of this pilot study was to assess a 2-year change in innate immune burden in 15 progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using PK11195-PET. Sixteen age-matched healthy controls (HC) were included for baseline comparison. PK11195 uptake was higher in MS patients compared to HC within normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and multiple gray matter regions. In patients, PK11195 uptake increased in NAWM (p = 0.01), cortex (p = 0.04), thalamus (p = 0.04), and putamen (p = 0.02) at 12 months. Among patients remaining at 24 months, there was no further increase in PK11195. Our data suggest that innate immune activity may increase over time in patients with progressive MS.


Subject(s)
Gray Matter/metabolism , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/metabolism , Receptors, GABA/metabolism , White Matter/metabolism , Adult , Female , Gray Matter/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Isoquinolines/pharmacokinetics , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/diagnostic imaging , Pilot Projects , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , White Matter/diagnostic imaging
3.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol ; 8(2): 385-394, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-995827

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pivotal trial have shown that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab had better outcomes. However, data on ocrelizumab in clinical practice are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary safety profile and effectiveness of ocrelizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including consecutive patients from nine public hospitals in south-eastern Spain who received ocrelizumab after it was approved. RESULTS: A total of 228 MS patients were included (144 with relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS], 25 secondary progressive MS [SPMS], and 59 primary progressive MS [PPMS]). Median follow-up period was 12 months (range, 1-32). No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) status at year 1 was achieved in 91.2% of the relapsing MS (RMS) population, while disability progression was detected in 37.5% of the PPMS patients (median follow-up period, 19 months). The most common adverse events reported were infusion-related reactions and infections, with the most common infections being urinary tract infections followed by upper respiratory infections and COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: The preliminary results in our real-world setting show that ocrelizumab presented excellent results in suppressing disease activity with a favorable and consistent safety profile.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Injection Site Reaction , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/physiopathology , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Spinal Cord/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL